Unfortunately the digital process will not work with Javascript disabled. You can find out more on how to enable javascript by clicking here.


29th Aug 2019

Plevin Provision – A ‘New’ Mis-sold PPI Rule

Case summary: Plevin refers to a Supreme Court case of Susan Plevin v Paragon Personal Finance 2014. Plevin, a retired college lecturer, was introduced to Paragon by a broker called Loan Line who could arrange refinancing at competitive rates. They assessed the customer’s ‘demands and needs’ for PPI and passed the matter on to the lender Paragon who accepted the business and carried out their money laundering checks which consisted of a telephone conversation with Plevin. However, they did not discuss the suitability of the insurance itself.

The loan was for £34,000 at 7.3% APR over a period of ten years. The loan was set out on the company’s standard form and regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974. The PPI was a single premium policy and was to be paid in the first five years of the loan, the cost of which was £5780 – 71.8% of this sum was commission. The insurance was supplied by Norwich Union. The commission was split between the broker (£1870 – 32%), Paragon (£2280 – 39%) and Norwich Union (£1630 – 29%).

Plevin initially claimed that she was mis-sold the PPI on the grounds that it didn’t meet her needs. She also found out that the PPI contained high-levels of commission that was not previously disclosed.

The case was eventually heard by the Supreme Court in June 2014. The grounds were that there was an ‘unfair relationship’ under s.140 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 between her and the finance company. The case therefore, centred on the non-disclosure by the finance company of the 71.8% commission included within the PPI premium.

Plevin argued that had she known that commission of this level was being paid, she would have questioned if the PPI represented value for money; therefore, she may not have agreed to take out the policy.

In November 2014 the Supreme Court found in her favour, that she was indeed mis-sold the PPI and agreed that the non-disclosure of commission could be regarded as giving rise to an unfair relationship with the lender. The judge said that the commission was beyond a ‘tipping point’ but didn’t explain what the limit or starting point of such a tipping point was.

Susan Plevin was granted full legal costs of £1.3m by the Supreme Court in March 2017

Read the latest News on Plevin Ruling


PPIClaims.com is a trading style of Money Management Team Ltd. Money Management Team is a member of the Professional Financial Claims Association (PFCA).
We comply with the PFCA Code of Practice

PPI Claims for Deceased Persons

Deceased Persons

If a PPI policyholder is deceased, any money owed to them becomes part of their estate, so whoever inherits the estate is entitled to make a PPI reclaim. This can be done by an executor or the person appointed to carry out their wishes after death. We automatically assume that reclaiming mis-sold Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) for deceased parents and grandparents may not be possible due to the passage of time.

However, the truth of the matter is it is quite straight forward to make a successful claim for mis-sold PPI for someone who is deceased.

To reclaim mis-sold PPI start with a FREE PPI check** with us today.


Claim Back Mis Sold PPI on Loans, Credit Cards & Mortgages

Complete our simple enquiry form and Start your Claim with a FREE PPI Check**.

Don't Miss the PPI Deadline £Billions Remain Unclaimed! No Cold Calling Guarantee Find out if you have a valid PPI Claim


Armed Forces Personnel & PPI

Armed Forces PPI

Armed forces personnel have cover for sickness, accident & unemployment built into their salaries. This protection means that if a member of the armed forces was unable to work due to one of these reasons, they would still be able to meet any mortgage, loan or credit card repayments they had. So any PPI insurance policies would NOT have been appropriate. To find out if you can reclaim for mis-sold PPI, start a FREE PPI check** with us today.

UK Expats & Non-British Nationals

Expat PPI Claim

Did you have a loan, credit card or mortgage in the UK between 1988 and 2014? As a British Expat or Non-UK National who has lived in the UK for a long period, it is likely that finances were arranged while you were a resident in Britain. This may include loans, mortgages or credit cards and, even though you are no longer living in the country you can still claim mis-sold PPI. You could be eligible to claim for mis-sold PPI!

Public Sector Workers PPI Claim

Public Sector PPI

For many public sector workers, the Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) they were sold was useless. However, for some of these workers it would not have been useless, depending on the policy type and cover it provided them with.

If you had PPI and it provided you with extra cover that hadn’t been included in your employment contract, then it may have been useful for you.

Business PPI Check and Claims

Business PPI Claims - Mis-sold Payment Protection Insurance

Business PPI - Like most consumer PPI policies, business PPI also know as commercial PPI was sold alongside secured and unsecured loans, overdrafts, credit cards and mortgages. Business Loan Repayment Insurance is a type of insurance policy sold alongside commercial loans, including Fixed Rate Loans, Variable Rate Loans and Treasury Loans. If you had a commercial or business loan between 1988 and 2014 you may be eligible for a PPI refund. Start a Free Business PPI Check and find out if you have mis-sold PPI to reclaim.